|
综观整个下半年，较有影响的几个学术、文学大奖，没有一个不是进行得磕磕绊绊，而评奖结果也均是颇多非议。先是“长江《读书》奖”就学术委员会召集人能否获奖在学术界引起了一场笔伐；接下来首届老舍文学奖也“惊爆出内幕”，得奖作品居然不在候选之列！战争逐渐升级，接下来的矛头就集中到了“茅盾文学奖”这样的国家级文学大奖：初评尚未启动，评委遭质疑，入围作品遭非议，直到最近好不容易评出了奖，还被冠上了“文学界的‘狗皮膏药’”如此不雅的称号，令人哭笑不得。但事情并没有因此完结，茅盾文学奖尘埃落定，对她的姐妹奖——另一国家重量级奖项——“鲁迅文学奖”的迟迟不露出水面，人们又开始了质疑：两年一评的鲁迅文学奖“难产”了？ Looking at the whole second half of the year, none of the influential academic and literary awards were stumbling, and the results of the awards were all quite critical. First, the "Yangtze River Book Award" caused a scribble in the academic circle about whether the convener of the academic committee could win the award. Next, the first Lao She literature award also "shocked out the inside story", and the winning works were not among the candidates! The war escalated gradually, and the next focus was on the national literature awards such as "Mao Dun Literature Award": the preliminary evaluation has not yet started, the judges have been questioned, and the shortlisted works have been criticized. Until recently, it was not easy to evaluate the award, but also awarded the title of "the dog's skin plaster" in the literature field. It's hard to cry and laugh. However, it did not end. Mao Dun's literary award was settled, and her sister award, another national heavyweight award, Lu Xun's literary award, did not come to the surface. People began to question: the "difficult" Lu Xun's literary award, which was evaluated every two years? | 
