|
今天中午，在五年级六班教室里，举办了一个别开生面的辩论会，当班主任宣布正式开始时：首先，由正方的一辩提出他方观点“开卷有益”，而我是反方的一位成员，也是反方一辩，反方的观点则是：“开卷未必有益”。 At noon today, a new debate was held in class 6, grade 5. When the head teacher announced the official start of the debate, first of all, the debate on the right side proposed the other side's view that "opening the paper is beneficial", and I am a member of the opposite side, and I am also the opposite side's argument. The opposite side's view is that "opening the paper is not necessarily beneficial". 然后正方的二辩杨语涵说出了论点，引经据典进行论证。反方的二辩杨雅不甘示弱：列出了三点，首先：书有好坏之分，其次，读书的目的有正邪之别，最后：读书的方法有得当失之差，并列了三个例子。 Then Yang Yuhan, the second argumentation of the right side, made an argument and cited scriptures to prove it. Yang Ya's second argument on the opposite side is not to be outdone: it lists three points: first, books are good or bad, second, the purpose of reading is good or evil, and finally, the method of reading is right or wrong, with three examples. 当正方的三辩提出他的观点时，有些结巴，这似乎被我方的三辩罗元元找到了漏点，于是她以中小学生因学习的压力，而沉迷在那些武侠小说里，所以可以证明“开卷未必有益”。 | 
