|
下面为大家整理的是关于一篇SAT阅读模拟题，是关于import competition，后面附有正确答案。SAT阅读考试和大家以前接触过的英语阅读考试有很大的差别，所以参加阅读模拟是非常必要的。下面大家就和小编一起来看看这篇SAT阅读模拟题的详细内容吧。 Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line of work. Since 1980 the United States International Trade Commission has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments. Another 340 charge that foreign compa- nies dumped their products in the United States at less than fair value. Even when no unfair practices are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been injured by imports is sufficient grounds to seek relief. Contrary to the general impression, this quest for import relief has hurt more companies than it has helped. As corporations begin to function globally, they develop an intricate web of marketing, production, and research relationships, The complexity of these relation- ships makes it unlikely that a system of import relief laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under the same parent company. Internationalization increases the danger that foreign companies will use import relief laws against the very companies the laws were designed to protect. Suppose a United States-owned company establishes an overseas plant to manufacture a product while its competitor makes the same product in the United States. If the competitor can prove injury from the imports---and that the United States company received a subsidy from a foreign government to build its plant abroadthe United States companys products will be uncompeti- tive in the United States, since they would be subject to duties. Perhaps the most brazen case occurred when the ITC investigated allegations that Canadian companies were injuring the United States salt industry by dumping rock salt, used to de-ice roads. The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United States operations was crying for help against a United States company with foreign operations. The United States company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a Dutch conglomerate, while the Canadian companies included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the second-largest domestic producer of rock salt. | 
