|
例：An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private group that is training recruits to fight against the Balaland Republic. The U.S. Neutrality Act plainly forbids US citizens from engaging in military campaigns against any nation with which we are not at war. Since no war has been declared between the United States and the Balaland Republic, we should bring charges against these fanatics, who are in open defiance of the law. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above? 首先，读GMAT考试逻辑题题干，知道这是weaken题。请立刻在脑海中想到答案就是最有效反对前提的一个。按此思路，我们就要找到因为。 此篇GMAT逻辑题原文的意思： 因为：某团体组织人在非战时进行对抗B国的军事训练;并且，法律禁止美国公民在非战争状态下参与对他国的军事对抗行为; 所以：该组织应被调查和指控。 GMAT攻略逻辑题的解法思路：我们要反对因为，那么答案一定要对因为的内容进行质疑。由于这里的因为有两句，所以为我们筛选质疑哪个因为增加了难度。但实际上，我们要质疑的不是法律，所以，第 二个因为就可以排除在答案之外。因此，你就要去在5个选项中找存在对第一个因为产生质疑的选项。 | 
