下面GMAT为大家整理了细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪,供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。 第一宗罪:无因果联系 The author commits a fallacy of over simplification. The line of reasoning is that because A occurred before B/that because A coincided with B, the former is totally responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps B is caused by C, or perhaps D is the cause of B. If so, then the author cannot justify 第二宗罪 Insufficient-sample The argument assumes that A is representative ofas a group. However, it supplies no evidence to support this assumption. It is possible that In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the authors conclusion is completely unwarranted. 第三宗罪: 错误类比 横向 It is highly doubtful that the facts drawn fromare applicable to Although there are points of comparison betweenand , there remain many dissimilarities as well. For example, A , however B Thus, it is likely more difficult for B to 第四宗罪 all things are equal纵向 |