人人终身学习知识网~是各类综合知识资源信息分享,提升综合素质与提高知识技能的终身学习网络平台

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录

微信扫码,快速开始

[GMAT写作] GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文五

[复制链接]

  63. According to this newspaper article, the Cumquat Cafe made a mistake by

  relocating one year ago. The author supports this claim by pointing out that Cumquat is

  doing about the same volume of business as before it moved, while RoboWrench

  plumbing supply outlet, which took over Cumquats old location, is apparently doing

  better because its owners plan to open a new outlet in a nearby city. This argument

  suffers from several critical flaws.

  To begin with, the two businesses are too dissimilar for meaningful comparison.

  Cumquats old location may simply have been better suited to hardware, plumbing, and

  home improvement businesses than to cafes and restaurants. The articles claim that

  Cumquat made a mistake in moving fails to take this possibility into account.

  Secondly, the articles claim that RoboWrench is doing better since it took over

  Cumquats old location is too vague to be meaningful. The author fails to provide a

  second term of this comparison. We are not informed whether RoboWrench is doing

  better than before it moved, better than other plumbing stores, or better than Cumquat.

  This uninformative comparison is worthless as evidence from which to judge the

回复

使用道具 举报

小黑屋/人人终身学习知识网~是各类综合知识资源信息分享,提升综合素质与提高知识技能的终身学习网络平台

Powered by 5wangxiao

© 2007-2021 5wangxiao.Com Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表