|
In this argument，the arguer concludes/claims that。The author cites。.as an example in support of his recommendation. Furthermore， he also assume that.At first glance， the authors argument appears to be somewhat appealing， but thorough examination reveals that the argument is problematic because of several critical flaws that are discussed below. Firstly， the argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that++++ However， the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support it. The arguer fails to take into account other factors that might contribute to the result that++++It is likely that++++++It is also likely that ++++. Any of thee scenarios， if true， would show that++++. Therefore， this argument in question should not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility that++++++ Secondly， the argument commits the logical fallacy of after this， therefore because of this。 In no case can the mere fact that +++++ be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover， that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnt necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact， the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative factors such as++++， or +++ that may contribute to a certain extent of B. It may be only a coincidence that+++++. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to+++++， this assumption in question cant be accepted. | 
