通过对于新GRE作文Argumen写作的经典题库的分析,考生们可以看看和自己对GRE作文思路分析上来说,有什么不同。也可以明白新GRE考试要求考生们进行新GRE作文写作时的要求,希望考生们通过思路分析,取得理想的GRE作文成绩。 arguement :The following appeared in a medical newsletter. Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment 先看我同学是怎么写的,他的3段攻击大概是这样的: 1.2个医生背景不同 2.2个实验组的具体情况信息实在太少,不足以判断 |