|
Claim: In any fieldbusiness, politics, education, government those in power should step down after five years. Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 结论：如商业、政治、教育、政府，在任何领域中的掌权者应该在五年后就让位 在任何领域中的掌权者应该在五年后就让位。 原因：对于任何机构，最可靠的成功途径是通过新领导阶层带来革新 最可靠的成功途径是通过新领导阶层带来革新。 In this statement, the arguer actually has a dual claim. First, no matter in which profession, those in power should step down after five years. Second, revitalization through new leadership is the surest way to success for any enterprise. As far as I am concerned, I concede that limiting the term of office/tenure is an effective way to prevent corruption and the lack of initiatives, however, I disagree with both the two claims. 1. To begin with, in many areas, especially in politics and government, it might be better that those who in power dont hold the same position all the time and should step down regularly. 1) It is known that absolute power will lead to absolute corruption. 2) And leaders tend to abuse their power when they have no fear of losing their power. In order to avoid corruption, autarchy, those in power should step down regularly. | 
