|
A million times I have heard the accident regarding a certain famous star shouted to separate fervid journalists and interviews from various media outside his or her door， which finally results a farce of quarrel and fight. Sometimes I really hate those drab reporters， who surprisingly have the endless power and fresh tricks to snatch almost each shadow of celebrities together with the innate ability to embellish them so fascinating。 At the same time those public figures shriek for their overexposure of privacy I am always pity for their embarrassment， for their career they really have no better choice but to tolerate， for their legitimate rights they had better struggle against the privacy revelation. But most of them， in the end， choose the former despite without any mustered negotiation. It is obvious to take into mind that being a public cynosure the first thing one has to be even eager to sacrifice is the privacy， in that the quality of public is just the opposite of privacy， in the rim of relationship， either one can only be maintained. The fundamental aim for a celebrity is to stand strong in the sight of public and win over the precious approbation from his or her fans. So packing oneself in his single world can help nothing to add his reputation， what he strives to do is the reverse-anatomize oneself in front of the public stares and acclaim for his names being praised or criticized in the sun-then can he make himself known out of the nonplus of being forgotten and lose his prestige in public. As a result， the condition of privacy being traced and published is no more a paramount incidence but under the prediction of them； after all， no reports， no celebrities. | 
