|
1、Moreover, the author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food. 2、The author ignores other likely benefits of agricultural technology that affect food pieces only indirectly or not at all. 3、In the first place, a great deal of empirical evidence shows that sequels are often not as profitable as the original movie. 4、However, unless the original cast and production team are involved in making the sequel, there is a good chance it will not be financially successful. 5、Since the difficulties inherent in this process make it hard to predict whether the result will be a success or a failure, the conclusion that the sequel will be profitable is presumptuous 6、This assumption overlooks other criteria for determining a bridges importancesuch as the number of commuters using the bridge, the role of the bridge in local emergencies and disasters, and the impact that bridge closure would have on the economies of nearby cities. 7、Without such evidence, we cannot accept the authors conclusion that no government funds should be directed toward maintaining the Styx River bridge. 8、The fact that the nearby city has a weakening economy does not prove that the city will not contribute significantly to tax revenues. | 
