母女“联名发表”论文引质疑
<p>一个18岁的高中生竟能在高三繁重的课业之余，依然“从事马克思主义研究”，并以第一作者身份发表长达12页的教育部资助项目论文？</p><p>请看相关报道：</p><p><span word="The">The</span> <span word="dual">dual</span> <span word="authorship">authorship</span> <span word="of">of</span> <span word="an">an</span> <span word="academic">academic</span> <span word="paper">paper</span> <span word="by">by</span> <span word="an">an</span> 18-<span word="year">year</span>-<span word="old">old</span> <span word="high">high</span> <span word="school">school</span> <span word="student">student</span> <span word="and">and</span> <span word="her">her</span> <span word="monther">monther</span> <span word="has">has</span> <span word="sparked">sparked</span> <span word="a">a</span> <span word="controversy">controversy</span>. <span word="The">The</span> <span word="papers">papers</span> <span word="show">show</span> <span word="that">that</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="mother">mother</span>, <span word="a">a</span> <span word="professor">professor</span> <span word="of">of</span> <span word="Marxism">Marxism</span> <span word="at">at</span> <span word="Zhongnan">Zhongnan</span> <span word="University">University</span> <span word="of">of</span> <span word="Economics">Economics</span> <span word="and">and</span> <span word="Law">Law</span> <span word="in">in</span> <span word="Wuhan">Wuhan</span>, <span word="is">is</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="secondary">secondary</span> <span word="author">author</span>.</p><p>一个年仅18岁的高中生与母亲“联合发表”的学术论文在网上引发热议。身为中南财经政法大学马克思主义学院教授母亲仅是“第二作者”。</p><p>网民称母亲帮女儿以第一作者身份(<span word="the">the</span> <span word="first">first</span> <span word="author">author</span>)发表论文，是为了让她获得两所当地高校的自主招生入围资格(<span word="to">to</span> <span word="be">be</span> <span word="qualified">qualified</span> <span word="for">for</span> <span word="independent">independent</span> <span word="recruitment">recruitment</span> <span word="in">in</span> <span word="two">two</span> <span word="local">local</span> <span word="universities">universities</span>)。面对质疑，母亲辩解称，孩子出生于书香之家(<span word="was">was</span> <span word="born">born</span> <span word="and">and</span> <span word="bred">bred</span> <span word="in">in</span> <span word="a">a</span> <span word="well">well</span>-<span word="educated">educated</span> <span word="family">family</span>)，有能力写这个文章。</p><p>虽不能一口断定高中生就写不出这样的论文，但公众对此事提出质疑，并掀起对学术道德的讨论（<span word="raise">raise</span> <span word="controversies">controversies</span> <span word="and">and</span> <span word="doubts">doubts</span> <span word="about">about</span> <span word="academic">academic</span> <span word="ethics">ethics</span>）也很正常。要回应质疑高校应对该学生的学术能力进行客观考核（<span word="obliged">obliged</span> <span word="to">to</span> <span word="get">get</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="student">student</span>'<span word="s">s</span> <span word="real">real</span> <span word="research">research</span> <span word="capability">capability</span> <span word="validated">validated</span>）。如证实造假，还应追究其母的学术不端（<span word="academic">academic</span> <span word="misconduct">misconduct</span>）行为。</p>
页:
[1]