SAT阅读高分指南(6)：社科类阅读-4
<p> 下面<span word="SAT">SAT</span>思为大家整理了<span word="SAT">SAT</span>阅读高分指南：社科类阅读-4，供考生们参考，以下是详细内容。</p><p> 社科类阅读</p><p> 例<span word="D">D</span>： <span word="OG">OG</span> <span word="P">P</span>608 <span word="paired">paired</span> <span word="reading">reading</span>，评论</p><p> <span word="paired">paired</span> <span word="reading">reading</span>是<span word="SAT">SAT</span>阅读一大特色，即将两篇内容相关的文章对比命题。<span word="paired">paired</span> <span word="reading">reading</span>文章篇幅有长有短，长篇中体裁以评论居多，两篇文章的观点则以相反居多。而在这个例子里是从不同方面评论相同话题，感情倾向大致相同。 <span word="paired">paired</span> <span word="reading">reading</span>命题时先分别考查对两篇文章的理解，再针对二者间的异同出主旨题或态度题，后一类通常占1/4至1/2。为了避免两位作者的不同观点对我们答题产生干扰，提倡先读一篇并完成相关题目，再带有针对性地看另一篇。同时由<span word="paired">paired</span> <span word="reading">reading</span>中主旨题涉及二者间比较，需要读出其中细致差别，且不适合在看到题目后才回头双管齐下地找中心.我通常会在第一遍阅读时就减慢速度，不采用跳读而是用快速浏览的方法找准作者观点, 这样有利于形成良好的另一感觉，不至于在做题时被错误选项的陷阱弄晕头脑。</p><p> 阅读前就嗅出文中异同，果然此例中看到<span word="address">address</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="ways">ways</span> <span word="in">in</span> <span word="which">which</span>有个关键词<span word="ways">ways</span>，说明两位作者讨论的是有关<span word="environmental">environmental</span> <span word="concern">concern</span>的不同方面，观点很可能相互补充、支撑。浏览第一篇文章找到作者的观点是<span word="environmental">environmental</span> <span word="popularizers">popularizers</span> <span word="often">often</span> <span word="present">present</span> <span word="a">a</span> <span word="one">one</span>-<span word="sided">sided</span> <span word="picture">picture</span>，<span word="becauseif">becauseif</span> <span word="releases">releases</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="power">power</span> <span word="of">of</span> <span word="fear">fear</span>。感觉速读有些吃力的同学们仍然可以试试找标志性词句：<span word="butpresent">butpresent</span> <span word="a">a</span> <span word="one">one</span>-<span word="sided">sided</span> <span word="pictureBut">pictureBut</span> <span word="one">one</span>-<span word="sided">sided</span> <span word="and">and</span> <span word="incomplete">incomplete</span> <span word="accountled">accountled</span> <span word="to">to</span> <span word="projectionsthathave">projectionsthathave</span> <span word="been">been</span> <span word="falsified">falsified</span> <span word="by">by</span> <span word="eventsButsurelyexaggeratedyetcontinues">eventsButsurelyexaggeratedyetcontinues</span> <span word="becauseit">becauseit</span> <span word="releases">releases</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="power">power</span> <span word="of">of</span> <span word="fear">fear</span>这篇文章基本上就可以串起来了。作者说关于环境总是有个<span word="one">one</span>-<span word="side">side</span> <span word="picture">picture</span>，即鼓吹环境问题的人常常将问题片面化，这样引发而来的一些推测警告等其实根本没有必要：环境问题显然被夸大了，但这种情况还在继续，是因为环境的作者能够借此利用恐惧的力量。第二段<span word="hare">hare</span> <span word="been">been</span> <span word="falsified">falsified</span> <span word="by">by</span> <span word="events">events</span>可能不大好懂，我们利用例子来帮助理解：<span word="Birds">Birds</span> <span word="continue">continue</span> <span word="to">to</span> <span word="singdo">singdo</span> <span word="not">not</span> <span word="have">have</span> <span word="to">to</span> <span word="face">face</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="rigors">rigors</span>很明显，<span word="birds">birds</span>没有感觉到任何危险，说明环境并没有遭到那么严重的破坏，那些环保者的推论都被事实证明为错误的。他们继续如此推论的目的是<span word="release">release</span> <span word="the">the</span> <span word="power">power</span> <span word="of">of</span> <span word="fear">fear</span>，关于为什么恐惧有如此力量作者却没有解释，下文一个<span word="though">though</span>就转到了<span word="arousing">arousing</span> <span word="fear">fear</span>如何如何难。这个小插曲并不重要，我们目前只需找出文章主题。</p>
页:
[1]