什么是做逻辑的最高境界
<p> 做逻辑的最高境界是不是那种，看到问题和题干，就知道<span word="ETS">ETS</span>会出什么答案的感觉？ 放几条刚刚总结的规律，抛砖引玉 名词解释 <span word="evidence">evidence</span>：证据，现象等，一般指<span word="A">A</span> <span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>：判断，推论等，一般指<span word="B">B</span> 元素：指<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>中的主语谓语或宾语（很重要！！） 一、归纳，<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>题型 1、有两个及以上的<span word="evidence">evidence</span>，没有<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，但有推理关系，答案就是是<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span> 2、有两个及以上的<span word="evidence">evidence</span>，且有数字作为<span word="evidence">evidence</span>的，答案是需要计算一下元素和数字关系的<span word="conlusion">conlusion</span> 3：有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，但<span word="evidence">evidence</span>会影响到<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>的准确性，答案是<span word="conlusion">conlusion</span>不正确 <span word="A">A</span>、上来就说<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，但举出来了一条<span word="evidence">evidence</span>是特例，答案是<span word="conlusion">conlusion</span>会被其他元素影响到 <span word="B">B</span>、上来就说<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，然后举出了一条影响<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>正确的<span word="evidence">evidence</span>，答案是<span word="conlusion">conlusion</span>被过高或过低估计了 4、有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，但彼此之间无关联，答案是<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>无关系 5、有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，但彼此矛盾，答案是<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>不存在 6、有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，且结构比较完整无疏漏，答案是<span word="evidence">evidence</span>的复述 7、有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，且<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>是两个元素进行比较的结构，答案是<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>的进行比较的另一种写法 二、演绎题 （一）假设题 1、有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，推理过程完整，答案是把<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>的元素和<span word="evidence">evidence</span>的元素搭桥建立关系 <span word="A">A</span>、情况<span word="A">A</span>，当<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>各有一个，并且都有一个共同的元素时，把<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>独有元素和<span word="evidence">evidence</span>的独有的元素建立关系。 <span word="B">B</span>、情况<span word="B">B</span>，有多个<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和一个<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>时，把<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>和一个<span word="evidence">evidence</span>共同用的元素和另外一个<span word="evidence">evidence</span>的独有的元素建立关系。 2、有<span word="evidence">evidence</span>和<span word="conclusion">conclusion</span>，推理过程不完整，缺乏某一个应该出现的<span word="evidence">evidence</span>，答案是这个<span word="evidence">evidence</span> 3、答案中含有<span word="not">not</span>，分为不能被他因削弱和<span word="evidence">evidence</span>的元素不能没有关系两种</p>
页:
[1]